Playing The Game Of Living
|
If you landed directly on this page,
you may want to
start at the beginning.
The economic law concludes that the money
wasted on the wars against each other has
resulted in a justification that we can not
currently pay for. That is to say, the pollution
is so toxic that all the money in the world
could not clean up the problem.
If the justification could be born by several
teams, perhaps we could buy enough time to
adapt. Since we are on the same team, there
will be no other team to help bare these costs.
Until all players realize that we are on the
same team, they will continue to spend increasing
amounts of money on responses that are not in
accordance with the other players (suggesting
an exponential trend. Make a mistake in
the spending of money (waste) --> waste more money
trying to fix the last mistake before adapting to
it --> resulting in fatter new mistake --> more
wrongful spending on "knee-jerk" corrective measures
prior to adapting to either of the previous mistakes,
etc. The complete formula is not yet known, but
appears to include "waste to the nth degree.")
The result will be a deceleration in our ability
to adapt -- relative de-evolution. Depending on how
you look at it... you will feel that time is going
faster... or, that you don't have enough time to adapt.
To an outside observer this "downward spiral of players
relative to game time"
will likely resemble the vortex
in a
flushing toilet (also known as
Cron Vortex Theory.)
At the current time, there is no known way for
the players to stop or reverse the game clock.
All players on the team will be eliminated.
Exactly What Econome Feared
The Social Justification theory suggests that
the players have created the conditions in the
"theater of operation" that will lead to an
uninhabitable environment during the game.